No optimal choicesAugust 27, 2007
So I’ve been playing lots of Memoir 44, and really enjoying the simple elegance of the design.
One of the biggest pitfalls for gamist design is when folks develop optimal solutions for a game’s strategy. Instead of being forced to rethink how to deal with each situation, the game becomes simply a puzzle- how long will it take for you to find the 1-3 optimal ways to play and then you can just go on autopilot.
This is a big problem for games that focus heavily on character building skills above in play tactical choices. Find the optimal builds, then let odds work for you and sleep your way through.
Likewise, for position based strategic games, you can often work out ideal positions or manuevers to employ (see opening moves in Chess, for example).
The interesting thing that Memoir does is that it randomizes the set of choices you have- you might know what would be an optimal move, but lack the cards to power it. So you often end up choosing between a lot of not so great choices.
So far, I haven’t seen a lot of rpgs really utilize this, though some of the card based ones do, and the whole tree of design that grew out of Otherkind as well. On the other hand, no one’s really used them for gamism, so it’s a field waiting to be explored.